In 4–6 weeks you walk away with a scored, prioritised shortlist of AI use cases — each with a business case and a clear place on a three-horizon roadmap. So you invest with evidence, not the loudest sponsor's conviction.
Most enterprises have a collection of AI initiatives — some strategic bets, some efficiency plays, some bottom-up experiments. But they don't have a portfolio. No common scoring framework. No explicit view of which investments serve which horizon. No way to tell whether the foundation work being done today will actually enable what matters tomorrow.
Without a portfolio discipline, every use case competes on narrative rather than evidence. The loudest sponsor wins, foundation investments get sacrificed for quick wins, and the organisation never builds the compounding capability that separates leaders from followers.
Use cases in flight across multiple teams — nobody can see the full picture or identify overlap and dependencies.
Decisions made by sponsor influence rather than structured scoring. No shared language for comparing opportunities.
Gut-level conviction that use cases matter, but no rigorous method to estimate value, cost, and feasibility.
Short-term pressure kills long-term capability. Data infrastructure and integration work is perpetually deprioritised.
Six deliverables that turn ad-hoc AI activity into a portfolio that compounds.
Mapping of AI opportunities across your value chain, categorised by top-line value, employee efficiency, and core process optimisation.
Structured scoring framework covering strategic alignment, feasibility, value potential, and dependency risk — applied to every candidate.
Visual roadmap balancing near-term delivery, foundation building, and transformative bets — with explicit sequencing logic.
Investment-grade business cases for priority use cases: value estimate, cost model, capability requirements, and risk register.
The data, integration, and organisational capabilities required to unlock horizon-two and horizon-three use cases.
Board-ready synthesis: portfolio logic, investment ask, expected returns by horizon, and governance recommendations.
Ready to see what to fund first? Get your use cases scored in 4–6 weeks.
Get your use cases scoredStructured to surface the right use cases, score them honestly, and sequence them for compounding value.
Stakeholder interviews, strategy review. Establish value categories, scoring criteria, and portfolio boundaries.
Three-channel discovery: strategy-led workshops, structured SME assessments, and employee-driven input. Build the long list.
Apply the scoring matrix. Size opportunities. Identify dependencies and foundation requirements.
Build the three-horizon roadmap, write priority business cases, and prepare the executive portfolio brief.
Owns the AI programme and needs a defensible portfolio logic to allocate budget and sequence delivery.
Needs to connect AI demand to infrastructure investment and ensure foundation work is protected.
Managing multiple initiatives without a shared framework — needs structure to prioritise and communicate trade-offs.
Responsible for ensuring AI investment aligns with corporate strategy and delivers across multiple horizons.
A structured, scored, and sequenced collection of AI initiatives — categorised by value type, prioritised by a common framework, and mapped across near-term, foundation, and transformative horizons. It replaces ad-hoc project approval with governed portfolio management.
A strategy sets direction and builds the investment case. A portfolio engagement focuses specifically on identifying, scoring, and sequencing the use cases that deliver against that strategy — with enough rigour to govern ongoing prioritisation decisions, not just the initial roadmap.
Three channels: strategy-led workshops with leadership to identify where AI creates asymmetric advantage, structured assessments with subject matter experts who know where value is lost in core processes, and bottom-up input from employees who identify opportunities from their daily work.
They stay in the portfolio backlog with scores and rationale. As foundations are built and capacity frees up, lower-priority cases move up. The portfolio is designed as a living instrument — not a one-time prioritisation exercise.
By making the dependency chain explicit. Every horizon-two and horizon-three use case has documented foundation requirements. When leadership considers cutting infrastructure work, the portfolio shows exactly which future value is at risk — in business terms, not technical ones.
Tell us about your AI ambitions. Sander or Pieter will reach out within one business day to scope a 30-minute portfolio review — tailored to your industry and operating model.
Want the full AI Operating Model framework? Download it free.
Our partners previously led Data & AI at
Sander or Pieter will reach out within one business day to scope a 30-minute portfolio review. No pitch deck, no obligation.